Difference between revisions of "User talk:Peggyenders"
Peggyenders (talk | contribs) |
Peggyenders (talk | contribs) (→content: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
OK< I'm in. | OK< I'm in. | ||
== content == | |||
Andrei, I've fooled around a little with the In and Around section, but I have some thoughts about the architecture in terms of content additions. For instance, there's the flora and fauna section, which should naturally lead to connections with citizens for lexington conservation, the conservation stewards, the conservation department and commission, the new pamphlet on conservation lands. Not sure how you want to set this up. i've written to Emily Schadler, the conservation assistant for the town, to ask her opinion. There is alot of good content for a section that then overlaps with "outdoors...." so I guess repetition is ok. Why a section on flora and fauna all by itself -- why isn't it in with "outdoors"? | |||
Peggy | |||
Revision as of 06:49, 21 June 2013
Welcome to lex-wiki! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! Andrei Radulescu-Banu 11:37, 19 June 2013 (EDT)
OK< I'm in.
content
Andrei, I've fooled around a little with the In and Around section, but I have some thoughts about the architecture in terms of content additions. For instance, there's the flora and fauna section, which should naturally lead to connections with citizens for lexington conservation, the conservation stewards, the conservation department and commission, the new pamphlet on conservation lands. Not sure how you want to set this up. i've written to Emily Schadler, the conservation assistant for the town, to ask her opinion. There is alot of good content for a section that then overlaps with "outdoors...." so I guess repetition is ok. Why a section on flora and fauna all by itself -- why isn't it in with "outdoors"?
Peggy