Difference between revisions of "National Politics:NSA Surveillance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
* Washington Post: [http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/nsa-surveillance-may-be-legal--but-its-unconstitutional/2013/06/21/b9ddec20-d44d-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html NSA surveillance may be legal — but it’s unconstitutional], by Laura K. Donohue (June 23, 2013) | * Washington Post: [http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/nsa-surveillance-may-be-legal--but-its-unconstitutional/2013/06/21/b9ddec20-d44d-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html NSA surveillance may be legal — but it’s unconstitutional], by Laura K. Donohue (June 23, 2013) | ||
: Laura K. Donohue is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center and director of Georgetown’s Center on National Security and the Law. | |||
Revision as of 07:09, 23 June 2013
This is a collection of news articles and commentary on the NSA warrantless surveillance, the MAINWAY NSA call database, the PRISM surveillance program and revelations made public by Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and other people who shared classified intelligence material.
News
Commentary
- Washington Post: NSA surveillance may be legal — but it’s unconstitutional, by Laura K. Donohue (June 23, 2013)
- Laura K. Donohue is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center and director of Georgetown’s Center on National Security and the Law.